Russell, A D; Tran, N and Staub-French, S (2014) Searching for value: Construction strategy exploration and linear planning. Construction Management and Economics, 32(6), pp. 520-547. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
Examined is how contractor or construction manager decision making and judgment in response to client objectives and project constraints can be aided by a structured approach to construction strategy selection and assessment using time-space project process and product modelling. The context studied is one of high-rise construction. Construction strategy is expressed in terms of strategy modes and tactical variables and accompanying values, which in turn are expressed in terms of a formal plan using a linear planning modelling paradigm. Highlighted is the important role that data visualization can play in both formulating strategy and assessing its workability via the medium of linear planning graphics complemented with other data representations that make use of quantitative product model data. Of particular interest is the ability to formulate and assess alternative construction strategies in a relatively fast and cost effective manner in order to achieve best value as a function of project constraints, context, and project participant objectives. Included in the assessment task is consideration of the impact of strategy on construction process productivity and production rates by way of performance metrics that relate directly to strategy workability. The concepts presented are illustrated through their application to a large-scale, mixed-use project.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction strategy; linear planning; productivity; value |
| Index terms: | modelling, mixed-use project, product model, paradigm, data visualization, construction manager, strategy, decision-making, construction process, high-rise construction, best value, workability, judgment, exploration, project constraint, productivity, performance metric |
| Subjects: | building construction, decision analysis, design methods, data science, construction type, profession, bidding, dispute resolution, control systems, performance measurement, analytical methods, management, modelling and simulation, environmental resource management, education and knowledge transfer |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Quality Management, Site Management, Legal Issues, Procurement, Project Management, Construction Technology, Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Design Practice, Risk Management, Digital Applications, Roles and Professions, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here