Effects of the location-based management system on production rates and productivity

Seppänen, O; Evinger, J and Mouflard, C (2014) Effects of the location-based management system on production rates and productivity. Construction Management and Economics, 32(6), pp. 608-624. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

Location-based management systems (LBMSs) are becoming more commonly used to plan and control production in construction projects. The main use has been to compress durations and improve resource efficiency through real-time production control and forecasting. LBMS theory proposes that instead of continuously updating the plan with actualized completion dates, as with the critical path method (CPM), control actions can be used to manage an effective response to deviations in production in order to realign the schedule forecast with the approved plan. Three healthcare construction projects in California were monitored to document the effects of planning and control decisions on production rates, resources and labour consumption. First, the authors hypothesize that proposed control actions based on the system led to real actions in the field. Second, these control actions helped in controlling production rates. Third, control actions decreased subcontractor labour consumption. The results show that control actions were implemented as a response to production alarms and half of the implemented control actions were able to prevent production problems. Many control actions successfully improved production and labour consumption rates with a long-term impact. However, adding resources often increased labour consumption and negated part of the expected production rate benefit.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: production planning; productivity; project control; site management
Index terms: resource efficiency, site management, duration, project control, becoming, forecasting, deviation, production control, productivity, location-based management system, construction project, consumption, critical path method, subcontractor, production planning
Subjects: prediction and forecasting, project delivery, financial and cost management, construction operations, operations research, control systems, practitioner, consumer economics, philosophical process, project controls, production management, management
Topics: Site Management, Time Control, Project Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here