Exploring 'zero target' safety programmes in the UK construction industry

Sherratt, F (2014) Exploring 'zero target' safety programmes in the UK construction industry. Construction Management and Economics, 32(7-8), pp. 737-748. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

Zero Target safety management programmes have become prominent on the UK sites of large construction contractors, who promote 'Zero Harm', 'Mission Zero' or 'Target Zero' on their hoardings and corporate websites. However, while Zero Target programmes may inspire increased commitment to safety from some, they may also cause detachment in others who feel it an unattainable goal for a high-risk industry. Examination of the practical realities of such Zero Target safety programmes has been undertaken, to illuminate and understand their position and potential impact on UK construction site health and safety management. A social constructionist methodology was employed, with discourse analysis of corporate websites, reports and promotional materials from five large contractors currently operating Zero Target safety programmes on their UK sites, supplemented by conversations with site management and operatives working on such sites. Zero was constructed as both a philosophy and a target, the corporate and site voices developing alternative visions of zero in practice. There is incoherence and inconsistency within the understandings of zero, which may affect the practical successes of Zero Target safety programmes, but zero was also found to have a very necessary place within industry safety management, in order to support future improvements in practice.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: discourse analysis; safety; safety management; social construction
Index terms: construction industry, operative, social construction, health and safety management, site management, commitment, construction site, philosophy, programme, safety management, construction contractor, methodology
Subjects: practitioner, construction operations, work location, psychology, health safety and environment, research methods, philosophical studies, industry analysis, sociology, occupational health and safety management, project controls
Topics: Site Management, Organizational Design, Time Control, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Roles and Professions
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here