Shiu, E; Jiang, Z and Zaefarian, G (2014) Antecedents of behavioural commitment in inter-organizational relationships: A field study of the UK construction industry. Construction Management and Economics, 32(9), pp. 888-903. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
Commitment is vital in inter-organizational relationships. It is important to understand what drives commitment which then affects the relationship between organizations. Commitment is a multidimensional construct and its dimensions can be broadly categorized into attitudinal and behavioural perspectives. In conventional practice, commitment researchers have tended to focus on the attitudinal perspective, while the behavioural perspective is largely ignored. In an attempt to buck that conventional trend commitment research is proposed along the unconventional but widely accepted as important behavioural perspective, building up a more complete understanding of the importance of behavioural commitment, as well as developing and validating a theoretical model that depicts precisely the relationship between behavioural commitment and its key driving factors. Accordingly a large-scale questionnaire survey has been conducted in the UK construction industry and 636 responses were collected. Structural equation modelling was then used to test the theoretical model. Results validate trust, reliance and dependence as the major antecedents of behavioural commitment. A new direction in commitment research adds new findings to the current body of commitment literature.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | behavioural commitment; dependence; inter-organizational relationship; reliance; trust |
| Index terms: | questionnaire, field study, structural equation modelling, commitment, survey, dimension, construction industry |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, health monitoring assessment and metrics, psychology, research methods, statistical analysis, industry analysis |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Health and Safety, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 CTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here