How to create a space for stakeholders' involvement in construction

Storvang, P and Clarke, A H (2014) How to create a space for stakeholders' involvement in construction. Construction Management and Economics, 32(12), pp. 1166-1182. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

The aim is to investigate how stakeholders can participate in the early phases of construction projects and how relevant insights can be gathered from stakeholders with very different backgrounds and interests. To gain these insights, it is important to understand how a space can be created to facilitate communication between professionals and stakeholders. The research draws on the literature of design and user-driven innovation in order to get a richer understanding of stakeholders' involvement in construction. The method applied is research based on three stakeholder workshops, interviews and observations from a single case study. The findings provide valuable information on six aspects of who the stakeholders are in construction, what these stakeholders can do in construction when involved, how to involve these stakeholders in a construction project, how a space can be staged and facilitated for the meeting of stakeholders, and what kind of information can be collected from the stakeholders to influence the development process. The findings show how creating and facilitating a workshop as a socio-technical space across boundaries can overcome barriers and improve stakeholders' involvement and thus provide better insights into their needs, values and concerns.,

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: action research; participation; space; stakeholders; workshops
Index terms: construction project, boundaries, action research, interview, case study, socio-technical, workshop
Subjects: production management, research methods, data collection methods, construction type, property law
Topics: Legal Issues, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Research Practice, Construction Technology
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here