The role of the supply chain in the elimination and reduction of construction rework and defects: An action research approach

Taggart, M; Koskela, L and Rooke, J (2014) The role of the supply chain in the elimination and reduction of construction rework and defects: An action research approach. Construction Management and Economics, 32(7-8), pp. 829-842. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

Since 2007, Ireland has suffered a circa 80% reduction in construction output. This has resulted in bankruptcy, unemployment and bad debt. Contractors have attached greater emphasis to production efficiency and cost reduction as a means of survival. An action research (AR) strategy was used to improve processes adopted by a small/medium enterprise (SME) contractor for the control of defects in its supply chain. It is conservatively estimated that rework, typically, accounts for circa 5% of total project costs. Rework is wasteful and presents an obvious target for improvement. The research reported here concerns the (first) diagnosing stage of the AR cycle only, involving: observation of fieldwork, analysis of contract documents, and semi-structured interviews with supply chain members. The results indicate potential for supply chain participants to identify root causes of defects and propose solutions, having regard to best practice to avoid reoccurrence. A lack of collaborative forums to contribute to production improvement was identified. Additionally the processes used to collect, manage and disseminate data were unstructured and uncoordinated, indicating scope for developing more efficient methods. The findings indicate a good understanding of the potential benefits for supply chain collaboration but suggest that the tools and knowledge to collaborate are currently lacking in the SME sector.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: action research; defects; rework; snagging; supply chain collaboration
Index terms: action research, interview, project cost, rework, strategy, contract document, collaboration, construction output, cost reduction, unemployment, efficiency, best practice, Ireland, survival, bankruptcy
Subjects: business, data collection methods, economic analysis, environmental science, operations management, contractual condition, Geography, performance management, economics, management
Topics: Quality Management, Organizational Design, Contract Administration, Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here