Developing and evaluating a framework for process improvement in an alliance project: A New Zealand case study

Vilasini, N; Neitzert, T and Rotimi, J (2014) Developing and evaluating a framework for process improvement in an alliance project: A New Zealand case study. Construction Management and Economics, 32(6), pp. 625-640. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

'Lean thinking' holds out the promise of dramatic improvements in construction production processes, especially in waste minimization. While there exist empirical studies of 'leanness' with regard to non-relational-type projects, there is a need to analyse its applicability in relational contexts, such as an alliance. The application of 'lean' to a project alliance in a viaduct replacement in New Zealand is investigated here. The primary objective is to define a framework to streamline improvements in processes and to verify the applicability of the defined framework to a real construction alliance project. Participant observations, project documentation and action research meetings were used to collect data on the waste identification and elimination processes. The findings indicate that the construction work in a project alliance can be improved considerably by eliminating or reducing waste. Moreover, the savings are substantial, as the processes investigated were cyclic and repetitive. This framework is equally suited to waste detection and improvements at the site level. Project organizations should detect needs and opportunities for process change and transform processes accordingly. The current lack of any waste elimination technique, which could provide a significant competitive advantage for industry participants, has been established. Organizational conditions exist in project alliances that help to disseminate and sustain the lean concept.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: action research; alliance; lean; process improvement; waste
Index terms: process improvement, observation, action research, minimization, project alliance, project organization, project documentation, construction production process, replacement, competitive advantage, case study, New Zealand, savings, process change, leanness, empirical study, construction work
Subjects: materials science, data collection methods, economic analysis, project planning, contractual arrangements, operations management, organizational theory, Geography, algorithms, research methods, management, market analysis
Topics: Digital Applications, Site Management, Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Procurement
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here