Social identity in the construction industry: Implications for safety perception and behaviour

Andersen, L P; Karlsen, I L; Kines, P; Joensson, T and Nielsen, K J (2015) Social identity in the construction industry: Implications for safety perception and behaviour. Construction Management and Economics, 33(8), pp. 640-652. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

The construction industry has one of the highest frequency levels and rates of work-related injuries, yet the evidence for successful attempts to reduce injuries is generally lacking. The motivational and (safety) behavioural implications of social identification and social categorization among construction labourer work crews were investigated to ascertain how their interactions are affected by the social structure and organization of work. Semi-structured group interviews and mini interviews during work were carried out with 13 concrete work crews (totalling 53 persons) at five large construction sites. The organization of work fosters social identification within a crew, resulting in distancing from and social categorization of site management. Social identification influences safety behaviour in the crews, where worksite safety rules may meet resistance. Future safety initiatives at large construction sites should take into account the dynamics of social identification and categorization in the implementation of safety measures, e.g. by creating an alternative organization of work, thus making it easier for a work crew to identify themselves with the site management. Site/crew managers should consider how safety can become a salient and valued group norm by altering the social structure at the sites and/or fostering dual social identity.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: group dynamics; interviews; safety management; work-related injuries
Index terms: safety behaviour, safety measures, interaction, implementation, social structure, construction industry, dynamics, site management, construction site, injury, interview, manager, safety management, social identity, evidence, group dynamics
Subjects: health conditions and diseases, sociology, occupational health and safety management, behavioral psychology, systems engineering, industry analysis, social theory, health safety and environment, work location, contractual arrangements, construction operations, data collection methods, evaluation and assessment methods, practitioner
Topics: Organizational Design, Site Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Health and Safety, Procurement, Roles and Professions
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here