Benjaoran, V; Tabyang, W and Sooksil, N (2015) Precedence relationship options for the resource levelling problem using a genetic algorithm. Construction Management and Economics, 33(9), pp. 711-723. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
The resource levelling problem (RLP) arises in project scheduling where the intention is to reduce the fluctuation of the resource demand. The solutions of the RLP are achieved through the rearrangement of the project activities under a constraint of preselected precedence relationships. To relieve the constraint, a new concept of the RLP with relationship options is initiated. An activity of the project network can have one or more alternative types of relationship with other activities as appropriate. An alternative relationship provides more float time and allows new possibilities for the arrangement of efficient patterns of the project resource demand. The scheduling problem model was formulated by using mathematical equations on spreadsheet software and solved by using the genetic algorithm based optimization. The prototype was tested in two different project instances. The test results demonstrated that this new model could calculate and arrange the project schedules for all selected alternative types of relationships. The model with relationship options provided consistent results for efficient resource utilization schedules, which were better than the one without relationship options. These schedules could decrease the resource demand fluctuation and the maximum resource demand level. This new model of the RLP with relationship options not only provides the additional flexibility to level the resource demands but also determines suitable types of relationships for the project activities.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction scheduling; genetic algorithm; precedence relationships; resource levelling; resource utilization |
| Index terms: | resource utilization, resource levelling, spreadsheet, scheduling, project scheduling, prototype, option, project network, genetic algorithm, construction scheduling, precedence relationship |
| Subjects: | modelling and simulation, decision analysis, project controls, algorithms, resource management, operations research, project planning, data science, site logistics |
| Topics: | Site Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Risk Management, Digital Applications, Time Control, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here