Mergers, acquisitions and the evolution of construction professional services firms

Connaughton, J; Meikle, J and Teerikangas, S (2015) Mergers, acquisitions and the evolution of construction professional services firms. Construction Management and Economics, 33(2), pp. 146-159. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

Whilst mergers and acquisitions are a favoured means of strategic renewal and expansion for firms, scant academic attention has been given to the growth patterns of construction professional services firms (CPSFs). The role of mergers and acquisitions in the evolution of CPSFs is examined. The findings are based on an analysis of the growth patterns of the top 25 CPSFs in the United Kingdom between 1988 and 2013. Since the 1990s, the increase in merger and acquisition activity has shaped the size, international presence, and multidisciplinary reach of the major CPSFs. However, CPSFs differ with respect to the intensity with which mergers and acquisitions are pursued. Whilst large, public limited companies are active acquirers, smaller and/or privately owned firms succeed in growing with a more selective acquisitive strategy, as they tend to rely more on organic growth. The findings call construction economists to attend to how acquisitions are radically changing the construction landscape and its main players. As the competitive advantage of firms is increasingly human capital-based, the example of the privately owned CPSFs that rely on organic modes of growth prompts a critical rethink of the role of mergers and acquisitions in firm growth.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: acquisition; construction professional services firm; evolution; merger; strategy
Index terms: United Kingdom, strategy, renewal, evolution, merger, acquisition, human capital, competitive advantage, presence, construction professional
Subjects: environmental science, business, market analysis, professional development, Geography, economics, renovation and retrofit, management
Topics: Organizational Design, Sustainability, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Business Strategy
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here