Fu, Y; Chen, Y; Zhang, S and Wang, W (2015) Promoting cooperation in construction projects: An integrated approach of contractual incentive and trust. Construction Management and Economics, 33(8), pp. 653-670. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
Contractual incentive and trust are two commonly used governance mechanisms that help to promote inter-organizational cooperation. Little is known, however, about the boundary conditions for the complementation of these two governance mechanisms. The aim is to investigate the interaction of contractual incentive and trust in promoting inter-organizational cooperation. A three-staged Stackelberg model was established and then solved by backward induction. Research results indicate that contractual incentive can motivate the contractor’s task behaviours, while the effect of trust on relational behaviours is path-dependent. Three levels of factors (intra-organizational, inter-organizational and project factors) would affect the selection of the optimal incentive coefficient. Moreover, when the changing rate of the client’s cost of effort is less than or equal to a threshold, contractual incentive and trust can be complementary. The study contributes to theory by offering nuanced insights into the governance mechanisms and addressing the complex contracting issues when mutual trust exists. In addition, this study can help to create favourable circumstances for the complementation between contractual incentive and trust, achieving a better project outcome and relational benefit.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | contractual incentive; cooperation; relational behaviours; task behaviours; trust |
| Index terms: | boundary condition, governance, project outcome, interaction, integrated approach, construction project, effect of trust, cooperation |
| Subjects: | contractual arrangements, psychology, project completion, business, behavioral psychology, sociology, production management, structural engineering |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Governance, Procurement, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here