Jarkas, A M and Horner, R M W (2015) Creating a baseline for labour productivity of reinforced concrete building construction in Kuwait. Construction Management and Economics, 33(8), pp. 625-639. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
Despite many technological advances, construction remains a labour intensive industry, and labour productivity remains the industry’s predominant determinant of performance. However, there is a lack of evidence-based labour productivity 'baselines' with which researchers or industry practitioners can compare the efficiency of the labour force, and subsequently establish sensible benchmarks. A rigorous approach to determining baselines for labour productivity of in situ reinforced concrete trades for major building elements under normal operating conditions in the State of Kuwait has therefore been developed. The data were collected from 208 in situ reinforced concrete building projects between 2006 and 2013. The intermittent observation data collection technique which requires the researcher to carry out weekly site visits to audit site staff daily records was used. Projects observed included residential, office and commercial buildings ranging from 1000 to 15 000 m2 in gross floor area, and US$300 000 to US$21 000 000 in construction cost, located across most major cities and suburbs within the State. For each dataset, the minimum, lower quartile, median, upper quartile and maximum labour productivity values are presented. Whilst the median and inter-quartile range represent the baseline or normal labour productivity range of the related activity, the lower and upper quartiles may be used as benchmarks to identify poor and exceptional performance. Although the metrics are specific to Kuwait, the principles of data collection, analysis and use are generic and could be applied to advantage in other countries.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | baseline; benchmarking; in situ reinforced concrete buildings; Kuwait; labour productivity |
| Index terms: | gross floor area, benchmarking, practitioner, site staff, evidence, dataset, efficiency, audit, building construction, labour productivity, construction cost, determinant, in-situ, labour force, reinforced concrete, Kuwait, commercial building |
| Subjects: | construction type, building construction, practitioner, economics, risk assessment, Geography, management, data management, building performance, performance management, building materials, performance measurement, financial and cost management, evaluation and assessment methods |
| Topics: | Construction Technology, Supply Chain Management, Cost Management, Geographical Context, Quality Management, Site Management, Digital Applications, Risk Management, Construction Materials, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Design Practice, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here