The fourth pillar of infrastructure sustainability: Tailoring civil infrastructure to social context

Kaminsky, J (2015) The fourth pillar of infrastructure sustainability: Tailoring civil infrastructure to social context. Construction Management and Economics, 33(4), pp. 299-309. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

This research proposes technical performance over time as a fourth pillar of sustainability theory for infrastructure. It also describes a method that allows us to discover how changes in the technical pillar (operationalized as reduced breakage rates) may moderate the influence of the social pillar (operationalized as repair rates) on sanitation infrastructure outcomes. Oral histories were used to develop a history of sanitation for each of 152 poor households in four rural communities in Bangladesh that have gained access to sanitation in the past decade. Transcriptions and qualitative coding identified reported states of sanitation (for example, broken vs. functional) at three time steps. These were used to develop an initial vector and transition matrix for a Markov chain analysis. The breakage rate in this model was then adjusted to investigate the impact of improved technical durability on sanitation outcomes. For the case analysed here, we found that increasing infrastructure durability by 50% (an estimated increase of two years) increased the rate of functional sanitation system use at model convergence from 54% to 88%. Increases in durability also caused households to use private rather than shared systems. Beyond this specific case, the generalizable theory and method presented here are analytic tools that permit targeted technical accommodation of social contexts specific to individual project sites.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: developing communities; markov chains; qualitative methods; sanitation; sustainability
Index terms: qualitative method, sanitation, repair, history, infrastructure sustainability, Markov chain, developing community, qualitative coding, durability, Bangladesh, household
Subjects: research design and methodology, mathematical modelling, data analysis and analytics, material degradation and durability, architectural and construction history, maintenance engineering, Geography, demography, sustainable engineering, communities and social development, environmental health
Topics: Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Construction Materials, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Stakeholder Management, Sustainability, Urban Studies
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here