Kokkonen, A and Alin, P (2015) Practice-based learning in construction projects: A literature review. Construction Management and Economics, 33(7), pp. 513-530. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
Construction project managers often face problems when trying to change work practices. Management research addresses these problems by offering stylized and abstract models; unfortunately, they may say little about the actual work practices that managers want to change. Practice theory offers an alternative way to address practice-related managerial problems, arguing that learning is a central enabler of performing practices. While some early research on practice-based learning in construction management exists, an understanding of how this theory has been applied is lacking. To address this limitation, a systematic literature review of 15 published construction management articles was conducted, the articles being divided into five practice-related analytical categories: participation, context, meaning production, power and becoming a practitioner to identify the areas of theory discussed. Participation and context were discussed more in the published articles than meaning production, power and becoming a practitioner, which might suggest that the latter categories offer more possibilities for future research. Further, the articles were analysed through a Lakatosian research programme lens, showing that a progressive research programme exists in practice-based studies in construction management. These findings provide avenues for future construction management studies seeking to apply practice-based learning theory to understand learning in construction projects better.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | human behaviour; learning; practice; project; social science |
| Index terms: | human behaviour, literature review, construction project, meaning, practitioner, work practice, face, becoming, systematic literature review, learning theory, manager, practice theory, programme, social science, management research |
| Subjects: | practitioner, management, project controls, health behaviours and lifestyles, theoretical framing, data analysis and analytics, research design and methodology, sociology, production management, learning theory, philosophical process, research evaluation and metrics, psychology |
| Topics: | Time Control, Organizational Design, Project Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here