The impact of the design team characteristics on the sustainable building construction cost: Structural equation model analysis

Hu, M and Skibniewski, M (2022) The impact of the design team characteristics on the sustainable building construction cost: Structural equation model analysis. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 18(5), pp. 614-630. ISSN 1745-2007

Abstract

The objective of this study was to identify impact of the design team characteristics and project characteristics on the sustainable building construction cost (SBCC) using the structural equation model (SEM). The cost data was drawn from 72 built LEED certified buildings in the United States. The design team characteristics are latent variables used to measure a design team’s performance in the early design stages, which are reflected in six observed variables: skill, experience, communication, collaboration, innovation, and procurement. The project characteristics are also latent variables and are measured in five observed variables: level of sustainability, building type, construction type, technical complexity, and project location. The SEM analysis illustrated that the design team characteristics negatively affected the unit cost (coefficient = −3.119) and cost overrun (coefficient = −0.939). The SEM also showed that project characteristics positively affected the unit cost (coefficient = 1.00). The conclusion indicates that the higher the design team’s skill, the more experienced the design team was, and the fewer communication channels there were, the better the team could mitigate potential risks and uncertainty during the construction phase, hence reducing the risk of cost overrun.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction cost; design team characteristics; project characteristics; structural equation model; sustainable building
Index terms: collaboration, sustainable building, structural equation model, construction phase, cost data, early design stage, unit cost, complexity, United States, design team, cost overrun, construction cost
Subjects: systems engineering, statistical analysis, management, accounting and finance, Geography, sustainable construction, design process, professional practice, project delivery, financial and cost management
Topics: Design Practice, Organizational Design, Cost Management, Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here