The challenges and potentials of utilizing building information modelling in facility management: The case of the center for properties and facilities of the University of Helsinki

Korpela, J; Miettinen, R; Salmikivi, T and Ihalainen, J (2015) The challenges and potentials of utilizing building information modelling in facility management: The case of the center for properties and facilities of the University of Helsinki. Construction Management and Economics, 33(1), pp. 3-17. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

Despite the promise of using building information modelling (BIM) during the whole life cycle of a building, there are only few studies of the actual uses of BIM and other information systems in facility management. We contribute to the discussion by analysing the Center for Properties and Facilities of the University of Helsinki. We ask (1) what kind of information tools for facility management the maintenance personnel use; (2) how the design data was handed over in the University’s central library project; and (3) how designers and facility managers find the possibilities of integrating BIM models and maintenance information systems. In the library project, the data was handed over and archived for potential later use. The information for the maintenance manual, however, was collected separately by an outside consultant. The designers thought that models should be simplified to meet the needs of the maintenance. The representatives of the Center did not see that uses of BIM models would provide a significant added value in relation to the potential provided by the maintenance information systems already in use. They found as a possible next step the transfer of some information from BIM models to their facility management and maintenance systems. A partial, stepwise integration of the systems seems to be a realistic way forward.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: building information modelling; facility management; integration; maintenance
Index terms: Helsinki, integration, information system, personnel, building information modelling, designer, manager, added value, whole life cycle
Subjects: sustainability assessment, management, Geography, information systems, profession, organizational analysis, practitioner, economic analysis
Topics: Human Resources, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Digital Applications, Roles and Professions, Organizational Design, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here