Explaining cost overruns in infrastructure projects: A new framework with applications to Sweden

Lind, H and Brunes, F (2015) Explaining cost overruns in infrastructure projects: A new framework with applications to Sweden. Construction Management and Economics, 33(7), pp. 554-568. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

The aim is to both develop a new theory-based framework for analysing cost overruns, and to use this for an empirical study of cost overruns in infrastructure projects in Sweden. The conceptual part is based on a literature review and the empirical part is primarily based on a questionnaire to project managers. The framework has a descriptive part comprising two dimensions: when, during the process, the cost overrun arose and what part of the cost function was responsible: change in the product, change in quantities of the inputs and change in price of inputs. The explanatory part is a development of Flyvbjerg’s theories and identifies four possible explanations: political/strategic aspects, psychological aspects, competence-related aspects and bad luck. The result from the empirical study is that most cost overruns occur in the initiation and planning stages up to the final design and are related to design changes and increases in the amount of inputs needed because of technical and administrative problems. Of the explanatory factors, there is most support for lack of competence and optimism bias.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction costs; cost overruns; infrastructure; Sweden
Index terms: empirical study, optimism bias, infrastructure project, dimension, project manager, Sweden, cost overrun, construction cost, questionnaire, competence, design change, literature review
Subjects: financial and cost management, health monitoring assessment and metrics, data analysis and analytics, contractual arrangements, data collection methods, profession, infrastructure and transport systems, cognitive psychology, personnel development, Geography, research methods
Topics: Human Resources, Procurement, Roles and Professions, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Health and Safety, Cost Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here