Ballesteros-Pérez, P and Skitmore, M (2016) Estimating the number of new and repeated bidders in construction auctions. Construction Management and Economics, 34(12), pp. 919-934. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
The number of new bidders – bidders from whom there is no previous registered participation – is an important variable in most bid tender forecasting models, since the unknown competitive profile of the former strongly limits the predictive accuracy of the latter. Analogously, when a bidder considers entering a bid or when an auctioneer is handling a procurement auction, assessing the likely proportion of experienced bidders is considered an important aspect, as some strategic decisions or even the awarding criteria might differ. However, estimating the number of bidders in a future auction that have not submitted a single bid yet is difficult, since there is no data at all linking their potential participation, an essential requirement for the implementation of any forecasting or estimation method. A practical approach is derived for determining the expected proportion of new bidders to frequent bidders as a function of the population of potential bidders. A multinomial model useful for selective and Open tendering is proposed and its performance is validated with a dataset of actual construction auctions. Final remarks concern the valuable information provided by the model to an enduring unsolved bidding problem and the prospects for new research continuations.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | bidding; forecasting; modelling; multinomial; new bidders; tendering |
| Index terms: | estimation, estimating, bidding, modelling, number of bidders, population, forecasting, implementation, bidder, multinomial, accuracy, dataset |
| Subjects: | statistical analysis, prediction and forecasting, demography, contractual arrangements, analytical methods, professional development, data management, financial and cost management, bidding |
| Topics: | Information Management, Urban Studies, Procurement, Digital Applications, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Cost Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here