Applying the dynamic capabilities framework in the case of a large public construction client

Adam, A and Lindahl, G (2017) Applying the dynamic capabilities framework in the case of a large public construction client. Construction Management and Economics, 35(7), pp. 420-431. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

Public clients in the construction sector face a number of challenges in designing, procuring and managing major construction projects. The client’s role in bringing about project delivery has more recently been emphasized, particularly with respect to developing capabilities that facilitate the coordinating of projects through its different phases. In line with these developments, this paper sets out to examine the management of capabilities in a client organization through the lens of the dynamic capabilities framework. In particular, what is investigated is how the client organization senses, seizes and transforms opportunities. In pursuit of this objective, an exploratory case study approach is adopted which examines one of Sweden’s largest public client organizations. The study explores the concept of dynamic capabilities and its applicability to the public construction context. Although the usefulness of dynamic capabilities as an interpretive framework is recognized, it is suggested that the concept of dynamic capabilities is inadequate for addressing the specific context in which public client organizations operate. Particularly with respect to the project-based characteristic of these organizations and the difficulty in framing what constitutes “competitive advantage” for public organizations.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: client; dynamic capabilities; firm capabilities; public sector; Sweden
Index terms: dynamic capability, construction project, construction sector, firm capability, face, client organization, framing, public construction, public client, project delivery, competitive advantage, case study, Sweden, public sector
Subjects: Geography, production management, management, industry analysis, administrative law, market analysis, sociology, building construction, data collection methods, client relations, business, conceptual models, project delivery, psychology
Topics: Procurement, Stakeholder Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Business Strategy, Organizational Design, Legal Issues
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here