Attarzadeh, M; Chua, D K H; Beer, M and Abbott, E L S (2017) Options-based negotiation management of PPP-BOT infrastructure projects. Construction Management and Economics, 35(11-12), pp. 676-692. ISSN 0144-6193
Abstract
The success of public-private partnership (PPP)-build-operate-transfer (BOT) projects largely depends on effectively mitigating the impact of a variety of risks and uncertainties, especially those influencing the revenue over time. Revenue instability is one of the main obstacles of PPP form of procurement. Government support, which is established as a clause in the concession agreement, should be carefully designed and well formulated. Options which arise from certain clauses in the contract are more valuable for risky projects. The purpose of this paper's proposed model is to evaluate early fund generation options and also to calculate equitable bounds for a guaranteed revenue for the project sponsor under uncertainty and risk. The model is specially designed to alleviate the concern of revenue risk. To illustrate its applicability the methodology is then applied to a freeway PPP project and a power plant PPP project in Iran. The results show that the value of these options can indeed be significant and by applying the proposed systematic negotiation mechanism both public and private sectors can take advantage of its flexibility at the negotiation table. The proposed mechanisms can facilitate negotiations on the verge of a break down as well as accelerating ongoing negotiations that have become moribund.;The success of public-private partnership (PPP)-build-operate-transfer (BOT) projects largely depends on effectively mitigating the impact of a variety of risks and uncertainties, especially those influencing the revenue over time. Revenue instability is one of the main obstacles of PPP form of procurement. Government support, which is established as a clause in the concession agreement, should be carefully designed and well formulated. Options which arise from certain clauses in the contract are more valuable for risky projects. The purpose of this paper's proposed model is to evaluate early fund generation options and also to calculate equitable bounds for a guaranteed revenue for the project sponsor under uncertainty and risk. The model is specially designed to alleviate the concern of revenue risk. To illustrate its applicability the methodology is then applied to a freeway PPP project and a power plant PPP project in Iran. The results show that the value of these options can indeed be significant and by applying the proposed systematic negotiation mechanism both public and private sectors can take advantage of its flexibility at the negotiation table. The proposed mechanisms can facilitate negotiations on the verge of a break down as well as accelerating ongoing negotiations that have become moribund.;
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | real options; build-operate-transfer; public-private partnerships; private finance; negotiation; electric power plants; electric power generation; uncertainty; revenues; government procurement; stability; project finance; breaking down; negotiations; project management; building components |
| Index terms: | infrastructure project, real option, project management, option, negotiation, build-operate-transfer, private sector, electric power plant, power plant, partnership, government procurement, private finance, government support, electric power generation, project finance, building component, methodology, stability, revenue, project sponsor |
| Subjects: | structural engineering, financial management, architectural elements, research methods, project management theory and practice, conflict resolution, partnership management, sociology, decision analysis, industry analysis, procurement strategy, infrastructure and transport systems, government bodies, energy systems, contractual arrangements, economic analysis |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Risk Management, Governance, Sustainability, Procurement |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here