Managing stakeholder networks for a social license to build

Boutilier, R G and Zdziarski, M (2017) Managing stakeholder networks for a social license to build. Construction Management and Economics, 35(8-9), pp. 498-513. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

When construction projects are halted or slowed by conflicts with stakeholders, they have lost their social license. Social licenses are granted by stakeholder networks, which include community groups, among others. Project managers would benefit from approaches that can predict which groups or coalitions within the stakeholder network have sufficient influence and motivation to delay progress and that can suggest interventions to reduce that risk. We present an integration of theories and methods that has been successfully used in the extractive industries to maintain a high level of social license. We define the social license concept, noting its embeddedness in stakeholder theory and the resource dependence view of the firm, and how it has been elaborated enough to become measurable. Then we integrate it with social network analysis and methods for quantifying stakeholders' issues and concerns. Key benefits are the ability to identify minority clusters that have sufficient influence to dominate the majority and the specification of network interventions to raise the level of social license. We use an example of a proposed housing project to illustrate how the proposed approach produces practical stakeholder relations strategies for gaining and maintaining a social license to build.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: issues management; network interventions; social license; social network analysis; stakeholder conflict; stakeholder networks
Index terms: stakeholder conflict, integration, construction project, stakeholder network, social network analysis, strategy, housing project, motivation, issues management, network interventions, specification, embeddedness, minority, project manager
Subjects: management, research methods, production management, contractual condition, financial risk, housing and residential development, organizational analysis, sociology, profession, psychology, communication, participation process
Topics: Ethics, Human Resources, Digital Applications, Urban Studies, Organizational Design, Contract Administration, Project Management, Research Practice, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here