What kind of expertise is needed for low energy construction?

Clarke, L; Gleeson, C and Winch, C (2017) What kind of expertise is needed for low energy construction? Construction Management and Economics, 35(3), pp. 78-89. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

The construction industry is responsible for 40% of European Union (EU) end-use emissions but addressing this is problematic, as evident from the performance gap between design intention and on-site energy performance. There is a lack of the expertise needed for low energy construction (LEC) in the UK as the complex work processes involved require 'energy literacy' of all construction occupations, high qualification levels, broad occupational profiles, integrated teamworking, and good communication. This research identifies the obstacles to meeting these requirements, the nature of the expertise needed to break down occupational divisions and bridge those interfaces where the main heat losses occur, and the transition pathway implied. Obstacles include a decline in the level, breadth and quality of construction vocational education and training (VET), the lack of a learning infrastructure on sites, and a fragmented employment structure. To overcome these and develop enhanced understanding of LEC requires a transformation of the existing structure of VET provision and construction employment and a new curriculum based on a broader concept of agency and backed by rigorous enforcement of standards. This can be achieved through a radical transition pathway rather than market-based solutions to a low carbon future for the construction sector.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: expertise; labour; low energy construction; transition pathways; vocational education and training
Index terms: low-energy construction, construction sector, agency, performance gap, energy literacy, occupation, transition pathway, enforcement, vocational education and training, energy performance, construction industry, European Union, transformation, low carbon, employment, qualification
Subjects: business, energy systems, management, sustainability assessment, physical geography and landforms, educational resources, performance management, health safety and environment, sociology, industry analysis, student development
Topics: Quality Management, Human Resources, Education, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Roles and Professions, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here