Sustainability assessment in residential high-rise building design: State of the art

Maleki, B; Casanovas-Rubio, M D M and Fuente Antequera, A D L (2022) Sustainability assessment in residential high-rise building design: State of the art. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 18(6), pp. 927-940. ISSN 1745-2007

Abstract

Twenty-first-century population growth is raising the need for more land space in urban areas and this has led to the construction of high-rise buildings, reducing horizontal urban development and making construction of residential high-rise buildings (RHB) a necessity in major cities around the world. In this regard, urban density and high-rise construction are key factors when determining a city’s sustainability and the liveability of urban areas. Sustainability indicators were identified in previous research and quantification has proven to be a useful tool for RHB design. This paper provides an overview of the various sustainability factors applied to RHB design. The paper also compiles information on the sustainability strategy, description of RHB issues and how this type of building can affect urban design. Some strategies may improve the natural environment such as incorporating green spaces, combining living, working and leisure activities, providing facilities for children and the elderly such as playgrounds and reasonably natural settings, ease of access to public transport, road networks and shopping facilities and so forth. The research is based on a descriptive approach and it analyses previous studies. The findings show that the environmental, economic and social aspects of sustainable development (SD) should be considered to implement sustainability in RHBs. Previous literature reviews on RHBs considered social aspects in less detail.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: residential high-rise buildings; surrounding environment; sustainability indicators; sustainable development; urban density
Index terms: urban density, urban area, population, liveability, urban development, state of the art, land, high-rise building, social aspect, elderly, quantification, sustainability assessment, public transport, high-rise construction, urban design, sustainability indicator, sustainable development, literature review, strategy, children
Subjects: real estate economics, analytical methods, data analysis and analytics, mental health and wellbeing, construction type, research dissemination and communication, sociology, measurement and scaling, building construction, demography, infrastructure and transport systems, urban form and morphology, management, sustainability assessment, urban design, health safety and environment
Topics: Sustainability, Construction Technology, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Urban Studies, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here