Francis, V (2017) What influences professional women's career advancement in construction? Construction Management and Economics, 35(5), pp. 254-275. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
Research on professional women’s careers in the construction industry has focused on explanations for their under-achievement and the barriers they experience, many of which are outside their personal control. However, some women are progressing, so it is important to understand what facilitates this process. Using a theoretical framework, involving individual, interpersonal and organizational factors, a cross-sectional correlational field study involving 456 professional women investigated the effect of a range of variables on career advancement. Individual factors rather than interpersonal and organizational factors were found to have the greatest influence on women’s career progression. This finding, contrary to previous women in construction research, indicates a “contest”, rather than “sponsored”, career mobility path. The research contributes to the understanding of the career advancement of women, highlighting issues with previous research which has identified mentoring, networks and other organizational support mechanisms as valuable to women’s advancement. It provides evidence that promotional processes have a potential gender bias, and while networks, mentoring and other forms of organizational support do not assist women with promotion, they are a valuable deterrent to women’s departure from an industry struggling with low female participation and retention.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | career advancement; careers; professional occupation; quantitative analysis; women |
| Index terms: | professional occupation, women, construction industry, organizational factor, promotion, mobility, retention, support mechanism, personal control, bias, career, evidence, quantitative analysis, mentoring, field study |
| Subjects: | probability and distributions, professional development, management, research methods, industry analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, behavioral psychology, sociology, evaluation and assessment methods, business, organization, data analysis and analytics, training |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Information Management, Business Strategy, Organizational Design, Human Resources, Urban Studies |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 CTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here