Inter-organizational resource coordination in post-disaster infrastructure recovery

Opdyke, A; Lepropre, F; Javernick-Will, A and Koschmann, M (2017) Inter-organizational resource coordination in post-disaster infrastructure recovery. Construction Management and Economics, 35(8-9), pp. 514-530. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

Despite significant advances in strengthening post-disaster recovery efforts, misaligned strategy and inefficient resource allocation are far too often the norm for infrastructure reconstruction. To examine the inter-organizational networks that form to coordinate resources for infrastructure reconstruction, we employed social network analysis in 19 communities in the Philippines following Super Typhoon Haiyan, at 6 and 12 months post-disaster. To build these networks, we analysed interview, field observation and documentation data collected from non-governmental organizations, local governments and communities. A survey questionnaire was also administered to organizations working in selected communities to validate networks. Results from network analysis established that information was the most commonly shared resource by organizations, followed by financial, material and human resources. Government agencies had the highest actor centralities; however, qualitative data suggest that these roles were the result of obligatory consultations by international organizations and lacked legitimacy in practice. Findings further demonstrate that networks become more decentralized over time as actors leave and roles become more established, influenced by short-term expatriate contracts and the termination of United Nations supported cluster coordination. Findings could help organizations strengthen humanitarian response efforts by attending to resource allocation and knowledge sharing with other organizations.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: coordination; disaster recovery; social network analysis
Index terms: network analysis, resource allocation, recovery, reconstruction, international organization, humanitarian, United Nations, post-disaster recovery, coordination, non-governmental organization, interview, local government, government agency, disaster recovery, strategy, social network analysis, knowledge sharing, documentation, survey, human resource, questionnaire, strengthening, legitimacy, Philippines
Subjects: Geography, professional development, management, structural engineering, research methods, post-disaster and reconstruction, administrative law, political science, building construction, emergency and crisis management, sociology, data collection methods, strategic management, data analysis and analytics, knowledge management, institutional frameworks, resource management, operations management, principle
Topics: Organizational Design, Site Management, Urban Studies, Legal Issues, International Construction, Human Resources, Ethics, Governance, Sustainability, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here