Papadonikolaki, E; Verbraeck, A and Wamelink, H (2017) Formal and informal relations within BIM-enabled supply chain partnerships. Construction Management and Economics, 35(8-9), pp. 531-552. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
Supply chain management (SCM) and building information modelling (BIM) are innovations that focus on integration. Recent literature suggests performance benefits from combining these innovations. Within supply chain (SC) partnerships, that use BIM–hereinafter called BIM-enabled SC partnerships–various formal and informal dimensions influence the inter-organizational relations. To understand such partnerships, a mixed method approach featuring case studies and social networks analysis (SNA) was deployed. SNA was an analytic approach to explore the complex relations within two Dutch BIM-enabled projects. The inter-organizational relations were asymmetrical and formal in Case A, emphasizing transactions, whereas in Case B, they were asymmetrical and informal, emphasizing relations. The transactional-oriented partnership had greater control over contractual issues, but their formal relations were not sufficient for diffusing BIM-related knowledge across the chain. Conversely, the relational-oriented partnership engaged the partners in BIM by informal means, e.g. dense communication and BIM-related peer-learning across all tiers. Symmetric and jointly fostered formal and informal relations contribute to SC integration. The study extends the knowledge base of SCM and BIM, by offering real-world data on their combination. Besides providing new insights into SNA deployment for BIM-related research, it also offers a novel constructivist and inter-organizational perspective on the old concept of SCM.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building information modelling; integration; social network analysis; supply chain management; supply chain partnerships |
| Index terms: | social network, social network analysis, knowledge base, integration, partnership, building information modelling, mixed method, case study, supply chain partnership, dimension |
| Subjects: | research methods, supply chain partnership, sociology, partnership management, organizational analysis, information systems, data collection methods, health monitoring assessment and metrics |
| Topics: | Supply Chain Management, Digital Applications, Organizational Design, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Stakeholder Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here