Bowen, P; Govender, R; Edwards, P and Cattell, K (2018) Work-related contact, work-family conflict, psychological distress and sleep problems experienced by construction professionals: An integrated explanatory model. Construction Management and Economics, 36(3), pp. 153-174. ISSN 0144-6193
Abstract
Contemporary communication technology blurs the boundaries between work-life and family-life environments, through after-hours, work-related contact. We examined the relationship between work contact, work-family conflict and consequent outcomes of psychological distress and sleep problems experienced by South African construction professionals. An integrated model of these factors was proposed and tested using path analysis and responses from 630 survey respondents. Work experience, gender, domestic situation and employment status explain the relationship between job autonomy and control, job pressures, and work contact, which were hypothesized to multivariately explain their negative effects. The final integrated model was a good fit to the data. The results indicate that the antecedents of work-family conflict are job autonomy and control, job pressure and work contact. Psychological distress is determined by work-family conflict, work experience, and job pressure. Sleep problems are influenced by work-family conflict, work contact and psychological distress. An important insight gained is the pivotal role played by job pressure, directly and indirectly, in work stress outcomes. Interventions aimed at reducing psychological distress and sleep problems among construction professionals should target the boundary permeability of work contact and work-family conflict, particularly for less experienced, female and junior professionals with low job control but high job pressure.;Contemporary communication technology blurs the boundaries between work-life and family-life environments, through after-hours, work-related contact. We examined the relationship between work contact, work-family conflict and consequent outcomes of psychological distress and sleep problems experienced by South African construction professionals. An integrated model of these factors was proposed and tested using path analysis and responses from 630 survey respondents. Work experience, gender, domestic situation and employment status explain the relationship between job autonomy and control, job pressures, and work contact, which were hypothesized to multivariately explain their negative effects. The final integrated model was a good fit to the data. The results indicate that the antecedents of work-family conflict are job autonomy and control, job pressure and work contact. Psychological distress is determined by work-family conflict, work experience, and job pressure. Sleep problems are influenced by work-family conflict, work contact and psychological distress. An important insight gained is the pivotal role played by job pressure, directly and indirectly, in work stress outcomes. Interventions aimed at reducing psychological distress and sleep problems among construction professionals should target the boundary permeability of work contact and work-family conflict, particularly for less experienced, female and junior professionals with low job control but high job pressure.;
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | sleep problems; workplace stress; work-family conflict; psychological distress; work contact; sleep disorders; sleep; work life balance; contact pressure; employee problems; construction industry; occupational psychology |
| Index terms: | occupational psychology, employee problem, construction professional, path analysis, work-life balance, workplace stress, construction industry, integrated model, work contact, employment, psychological distress, boundaries, job control, work-family conflict, sleep problem, sleep disorder, work stress, permeability, survey |
| Subjects: | health conditions and diseases, industry analysis, statistical analysis, management, material properties and characteristics, professional development, psychology, property law, analytical methods, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Health and Safety, Research Practice, Construction Materials, Information Management, Organizational Design, Legal Issues, Human Resources |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here