Developing design guidelines for university campus in hot climate using quality function deployment (QFD): The case of the University of sharjah, UAE

Mushtaha, E; Alsyouf, I; Hamad, R; Elmualim, A; Maksoud, A and Yahia, M W (2022) Developing design guidelines for university campus in hot climate using quality function deployment (QFD): The case of the University of sharjah, UAE. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 18(5), pp. 593-613. ISSN 1745-2007

Abstract

While many universities persist in receiving better rankings and recognitions for their sustainability endeavours, the stakeholders' voices, notably the universities' main customers, the students, are almost absent in the process. This study intends to include stakeholders' voices in the campus planning to achieve a comprehensive university campus that serves its community’s socio-cultural and economic needs. An intensive literature review was conducted aimed to derive criteria affecting campus design and development, such as comfort, wellbeing, and safety of the faculty, students and other users. Following that, a survey-based study assessed the University of Sharjah’s (UOS) main campus as a case study. The Quality Function Deployment (QFD) was used as a development tool to determine and satisfy the stakeholders' needs using equivalent matrices. As a result, it was found that a well-designed university campus can be achieved when themes of sustainability, liveability, comfort, safety and security are well integrated into the design, development and operation of campuses. Accordingly, the study recommended design guidelines to help decision-makers identify the factors impacting their higher institution campuses, analyze and develop enhanced campus designs that ensure a welcoming and thriving environment. This will contribute to enhancing students' experience and satisfaction and further advance an institution’s ranking profile globally.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: campus; livability; qfd; sharjah; sustainability; UAE; uos
Index terms: survey, literature review, quality function deployment, well-being, livability, liveability, hot climate, comfort, design and development, case study, satisfaction
Subjects: mental health and wellbeing, data analysis and analytics, occupational health and safety management, quality assurance, climate science, project delivery, data collection methods, design process
Topics: Health and Safety, Project Management, Urban Studies, Sustainability, Quality Management, Design Practice, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here