Integrating product and process design in construction

da Rocha, C G and Kemmer, S (2018) Integrating product and process design in construction. Construction Management and Economics, 36(9), pp. 535-543. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

Product modularity namely the notion that products can be decomposed into parts (or modules) has been widely applied in manufacturing but not in construction, precluding this industry to also benefit from it. The narrow definition of a module, which is often simplistically equated to a sub-assembly produced off-site, and the lack of integration between product and process design, which is typical in construction, are argued to be two root causes of such problem. This paper starts by discussing the operational implications of misaligned decisions in these two domains in an empirical study addressing a high-rise apartments building project. Seven guidelines are then devised using a Design Science Research (DSR) approach for integrating product (product modularity and modules) and process (work structure and work packages) design. The results indicate that product modularity can be applied for improving operations regardless of the construction method(s) used. Yet, a revised understanding of modules (as a material, a component, a non-volumetric or a volumetric sub-assembly) is needed in addition to a coordinated product and process design, particularly for traditional construction.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: customization; modularization; off-site construction; workflow
Index terms: workflow, construction product, integration, modularity, process design, construction method, design science research, off-site construction, modularization, empirical study, module, customization, traditional construction, package
Subjects: organizational analysis, building construction, design flexibility, heritage and conservation, management, architectural elements, design practice, research methods, construction manufacturing, contractual arrangements, economic analysis, design methods
Topics: Research Practice, Business Strategy, Procurement, Construction Technology, Design Practice, Organizational Design, Site Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here