On the nexus of changing public facilities management practices: Purposive and co-creative actions across multiple levels

Gluch, P and Svensson, I (2018) On the nexus of changing public facilities management practices: Purposive and co-creative actions across multiple levels. Construction Management and Economics, 36(5), pp. 259-275. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

Building on a practice-oriented approach and the theoretical construct of institutional work, the organizational nexus of changing practices for public facilities management is conceptualized in a multi-level framework. To support the conceptual framework, changing management practices are illustrated with the help of real-life experiences gained in a case study of a strategy project in a Swedish public construction client organization with the goal of developing a strategic facilities plan. These real-life examples, captured through interviews and field observations, cohere with the research method of narrative inquiry. The framework envisions projective agencies of various actors, both human and non-human (objects), in change processes. Findings show how key actors, through collaborative co-creation processes, take different complementary roles when promoting new practices into a specific organizational setting. By jointly promoting a set of preferred arrangements they establish proto-institutions. In addition, various objects were attributed rhetorical agency to support new public FM practices in that these served as purposeful non-human actors, triggering and legitimizing actions taken. With focus on emerging institutions in the making and especially projective agencies for institutional change, this research contributes to furthered layered understandings on institutional work related to change in construction in general and specifically in public sustainable facilities management.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: case study; facilities management; institutional work; multi-level framework; practice lens; public buildings; renovation
Index terms: client organization, non-human actor, interview, management practice, case study, renovation, public construction, co-creation, facilities management, practice lens, conceptual framework, narrative, public building, institutional work, agency, institutional change, strategy
Subjects: theoretical framing, data collection methods, client relations, qualitative and interpretive research, management, research design and methodology, design process, renovation and retrofit, construction type, building construction, sociology
Topics: Organizational Design, Business Strategy, Stakeholder Management, Engineering Principles, Construction Technology, Research Practice, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here