McDermott, V; Zhang, R P; Hopkins, A and Hayes, J (2018) Constructing safety: Investigating senior executive long-term incentive plans and safety objectives in the construction sector. Construction Management and Economics, 36(5), pp. 276-290. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
In the private sector, incentive plans are one of the major means used by Boards of Directors to align the interests of senior management with organizational interests. However, research conducted in the energy and resources sector revealed a poor alignment between incentive plans and the need to have senior management focus on safety. The research discussed here examined long-term incentive plans (LTIPs) for senior executives in the construction sector to investigate whether these direct senior managers attention to long-term safety objectives and if they include any long-term safety indicators. Annual Reports of publicly listed companies in the Australian non-domestic construction sector were used as the major information source and subjected to content analysis. Despite a strong safety commitment expressed by all the companies, LTIPs were exclusively associated with financial indicators. Although safety indicators are included in Annual Reports, these only appear in short-term incentive plans, indicating that senior executives are not incentivized to align their long-term decision-making with long-term safety objectives. Findings from the research demonstrate that valid and meaningful safety indicators should be developed and included in LTIPs in order to better align the focus of senior management to include safety performance in the construction industry.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | governance; incentive plans; management; safety; senior executives |
| Index terms: | construction industry, governance, private sector, domestic construction, decision-making, incentive plan, construction sector, safety performance, manager, commitment, annual report, senior executive, content analysis |
| Subjects: | management, decision analysis, occupational health and safety management, leadership, industry analysis, business, construction type, practitioner, psychology, data analysis and analytics |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Human Resources, Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Construction Technology, Governance, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here