Patlakas, P; Musso, M and Larkham, P (2022) A digital curation model for post-occupancy evaluation data. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 18(2), pp. 128-148. ISSN 1745-2007
Abstract
Post-Occupancy Evaluation (POE) is an important component of a cyclical design process that allows cost savings and promotes accountability of designers, owners, and users, as well as allowing identification of facilities issues and informed decision-making. It is reasonable to expect that the combined effect of new data-gathering technologies and the increasing urgency of sustainable building design will be that POE studies will increase and, eventually, be applied at a mass scale. Digital Curation (DC) allows for the long-term preservation and constant re-use of research data. Yet there has been no attempt so far to develop a DC strategy for POE data. This paper introduces the concept of Digital Curation and relates it to objective, quantitative POE data. A combination of a literature review and a questionnaire sent to expert respondents is utilised in order to identify data types and major Digital Curation issues relevant to POE. A Digital Curation Model (DCM) for POE data is presented, drawing from the existing models, examples, and best practice available, intended to act as a framework that enables the storage, archiving, management, recovery and utilisation of such data on a mass scale. Finally, the importance, benefits, obstacles and implications of developing a suitable DC strategy for Post-Occupancy Evaluation are discussed.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building monitoring; data management; digital curation; post-occupancy evaluation |
| Index terms: | designer, accountability, drawing, owner, post-occupancy evaluation, literature review, strategy, data management, re-use, design process, recovery, cost saving, questionnaire, building monitoring, decision-making, best practice, sustainable building design |
| Subjects: | economics, management, health safety and environment, asset management, sociology, decision analysis, data management, liability law, business, profession, data collection methods, design methods, technical documentation, operations management, evaluation methods, data analysis and analytics, energy systems |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Legal Issues, Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Risk Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Cost Management, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here