Rahmani, F and Leifels, K (2018) Abductive grounded theory: A worked example of a study in construction management. Construction Management and Economics, 36(10), pp. 565-583. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
Grounded Theory, now more than 50 years old, is a qualitative research approach widely employed in the social and human science studies to develop theories with a high degree of conceptuality. For construction management research, given the nature of this applied sub-discipline of management, a paradigmatic shift in Grounded Theory is needed, from classical positivism to pragmatism. Abductive Grounded Theory is posited as the way to achieve this shift in research methodology. The proposition is explored through a worked example, using Early Contractor Involvement research as a case study to demonstrate the research process. The data analysis process of open coding, axial coding and selective coding is described, together with the process of matching complementary prospect theory to explain the interdependencies between theoretical categories. The issues of validity and reliability are addressed. Of particular importance is the faithfulness to the original analytical coding process and then abduction of existing theories from salient literature to explain the relationships amongst emergent concepts. The findings show that, while the development of the research question is initially influenced by the review of literature, there is no deliberate effort to direct or force the collected information towards any set of pre-defined concepts. The study shows promising potential for using Abductive Grounded Theory to develop conceptual and instrumental theories in construction management research.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | abductive approach; grounded theory; qualitative research; research methodology |
| Index terms: | grounded theory, validity, case study, abductive approach, research methodology, early contractor involvement, science, management research, data analysis, pragmatism, prospect theory, qualitative research, positivism |
| Subjects: | theoretical framing, philosophical concept, specialized education, evaluation and assessment methods, data collection methods, research design and methodology, data analysis and analytics, contractual arrangements, economic analysis |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Research Practice, Procurement, Education |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here