A meta-frontier method of decomposing long-term construction productivity components and technological gaps at the firm level: Evidence from Malaysia

Azman, M A; Hon, C K H; Skitmore, M; Lee, B L and Xia, B (2019) A meta-frontier method of decomposing long-term construction productivity components and technological gaps at the firm level: Evidence from Malaysia. Construction Management and Economics, 37(2), pp. 72-88. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

There is a need for a better approach to measure construction productivity rigorously, multilaterally, longitudinally and decomposed into its components. In response, this paper offers a robust approach to analysing construction productivity at the firm level that has been lacking in the industry to date, by measuring the Total Factor Productivity (TFP) of 37 public-listed Malaysian construction firms over 14 years (2003–2016), based on the Färe-Primont index. In comparing different groups of building, civil and specialist construction firms, this is the first application of a meta-frontier framework to capture the technological gaps involved. Based on the construction firms' financial data, it is found that TFP improvement generally occurs due to Technical Efficiency (TE) and Scale-Mix Efficiency (SME) (largely scope economies), and significant technological gaps exist among different groups. Moreover, the industry suffered a decline in technologically related production environment over the period–prompting the conclusion that long-term policy engagement should focus on technological improvements. The paper provides a robust approach to analysing construction productivity at the firm level that also can be used for accessing productivity components and technological gaps in construction and other industries.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction; firm; färe-primont; Malaysia; meta-frontier; total factor productivity
Index terms: construction productivity, productivity, Malaysia, efficiency, evidence, construction firm, total factor productivity
Subjects: performance management, management, Geography, organization, evaluation and assessment methods, production economics, operations management
Topics: Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Quality Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here