Assessing the implementation of BIM: an information systems approach

Dowsett, R M and Harty, C F (2019) Assessing the implementation of BIM: an information systems approach. Construction Management and Economics, 37(10), pp. 551-566. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

Much attention has been paid to measuring the perceived benefits of Building Information Modelling (BIM). Yet despite an increase its adoption throughout the construction industry, important links between implementation, support and benefits are yet to be explored. We examine the constitutive elements of the BIM implementation process of two case studies implementing and using BIM: the first is a large urban regeneration project, and the second is a healthcare project. A well-recognised model of system success is mobilized from the field of information systems (ISs) to reveal that irrespective of project size and type, BIM benefits are confined to technically discrete productivity and efficiency gains when there is limited focus on the organizational aspects of BIM adoption. This paper focuses on the disconnections between organizational and project level BIM implementation using the DeLone and McLean Model as an analytical framework to systematically examine the benefits of BIM to each project in relation to the implementation approach employed. This study highlights the significance of these interdependencies and argues for a more comprehensive approach to BIM benefits capture that recognises this to usefully inform implementation strategy development.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: assessment; benefits; BIM; implementation
Index terms: productivity, case study, efficiency, building information modelling, organizational aspect, implementation, construction industry, strategy, information system, analytical framework, urban regeneration
Subjects: industry analysis, information systems, management, post-disaster and reconstruction, performance management, contractual arrangements, data analysis and analytics, data collection methods, business
Topics: Research Practice, Business Strategy, Procurement, Quality Management, Urban Studies, Digital Applications, Organizational Design
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here