Du, J; Zhao, D and Zhang, O (2019) Impacts of human communication network topology on group optimism bias in capital project planning: A human-subject experiment. Construction Management and Economics, 37(1), pp. 44-60. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
Capital projects are critical to the world’s economy. Despite the advancement of prediction techniques, capital projects still suffer from overly optimistic plans, i.e. tight budgets and schedules. This article focuses on understanding this issue from the perspective of optimism bias, i.e. a psychological bias toward the inclination to be overly optimistic about the chance of success. We hypothesize that human communication network topologies are strong predictors of harmful optimism bias at the group level in project planning. A human-subject experiment was performed to test group optimism bias levels under different communication network topologies. We recruited 103 subjects to estimate the cost of an artificial power plant project. The communication networks were manipulated to reflect different topologies. The subjects' estimates were compared to a Monte Carlo simulation result based on real historical data to quantify the level of optimism bias at the group level. Preliminary results find that certain human communication network topology leads to more realistic estimates, possibly due to a process of updating individual judgement based on peers' judgements. The findings of this study are expected to urge further theoretical investigations into the development of simple yet effective decision support systems to reduce decision-making bias in capital project planning.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | communication network; optimism bias; project planning; topology |
| Index terms: | experiment, investigation, power plant, decision support, human communication, Monte Carlo simulation, communication network, capital project, decision-making, bias, topology, estimate, optimism bias, network topologies, project planning |
| Subjects: | control systems, probability and distributions, modelling and simulation, cognitive psychology, financial and cost management, strategic project management, geometry and topology, decision analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, networking, human factors and perception, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Risk Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Cost Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here