Taking on a wider view: Public value interests of construction clients in a changing construction industry

Kuitert, L; Volker, L and Hermans, M H (2019) Taking on a wider view: Public value interests of construction clients in a changing construction industry. Construction Management and Economics, 37(5), pp. 257-277. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

For financial and strategic reasons, public and semi-public construction clients increasingly depend on private parties to carry out public service delivery. They subcontract operational responsibilities to private parties while remaining socio-politically responsible for ensuring public values. Public administration literature mainly addresses the importance of procedural and performance values in safeguarding public values. However, safeguarding the quality of the built environment also requires a focus on product values. In this study, we aim to increase the understanding of the meaning and significance of public values in the daily practice of public construction clients and identify the challenges they face in commissioning these seemingly opposing values. A set of semi-structured interviews with the public administrators of a variety of public and semi-public construction client organizations in the Netherlands shows that both internal and external factors influence the collaborative practices between clients and contractors. This causes a value shift from an emphasis on procedural values to managing performance and product values, indicating that clients need to take on a wider view on public values. Six main public value dilemmas were found that complicate the task of developing an open, transparent and sustainable long-term client–contractor relationship. The current contractual system, however, lacks the flexibility to facilitate this product-based value view in construction.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: public clients; public service delivery; public value; the Netherlands; value conflict
Index terms: client organization, face, Netherlands, meaning, subcontract, interview, commissioning, construction client, service delivery, public value, construction industry, public client, collaborative practice, built environment, public construction
Subjects: psychology, practitioner, contract type, client relations, data collection methods, collaborative management, completion, political science, infrastructure and transport systems, industry analysis, building construction, sociology, service delivery, Geography
Topics: Urban Studies, Quality Management, Organizational Design, Contract Administration, Business Strategy, Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Governance
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here