Lindblad, H (2019) Black boxing BIM: The public client's strategy in BIM implementation. Construction Management and Economics, 37(1), pp. 1-12. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
Building information modelling (BIM) is widely discussed in both industry and academia and studies have argued that public clients play an important role in industry’s implementation of BIM. While public client initiatives have gained much interest in previous research, there is still a lack of knowledge exploring the public clients' role and choice of strategies when implementing BIM with the aim to change industry. Based on a case study of BIM implementation at the largest infrastructure client in Sweden, this paper applies the theory sociology of translation to explore the role of the public client as a driver for industry change and the strategy used during this process. The case study shows how the public client tries to influence its own organization and the construction industry as a whole. Findings show that the main strategy for enrolling actors to implement BIM is to demand its use in the procurement of all construction projects, thereby attempting to establish the BIM issue as a Black Box. A Black Box, a locked network element, which includes associated inscriptions aimed at prescribing BIM use in projects conducted by this client. The acceptance of this Black Box has however been problematic, resulting in a diverse influence on the demand for BIM in procured construction projects.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | actor-network theory; BIM; building information modelling; implementation; sociology of translation |
| Index terms: | Sweden, sociology, case study, building information modelling, construction industry, public client, implementation, academia, strategy, construction project |
| Subjects: | contractual arrangements, data collection methods, educational institutions, sociology, information systems, industry analysis, management, social theory, production management, Geography |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Education, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Stakeholder Management, Procurement |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here