Lingard, H; Oswald, D and Le, T (2019) Embedding occupational health and safety in the procurement and management of infrastructure projects: Institutional logics at play in the context of new public management. Construction Management and Economics, 37(10), pp. 567-583. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
The research explored the approaches used by government agencies (as client organizations) to drive occupational health and safety (OHS) performance improvements in publicly funded infrastructure construction projects in Australia. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 32 representatives of clients and contractors with direct and recent experience of delivering large public infrastructure projects. Interviews explored the procurement approaches taken, and the use of incentives and performance measurement. Data was subjected to inductive analysis to identify emergent concepts and themes relating to the way that New Public Management (NPM) influences the commercial management of infrastructure construction projects, with particular reference to OHS impacts. The concept of institutional logics was utilised as a theoretical frame to understand clients' behaviour in the commercial management of infrastructure projects. Client behaviour was consistent with elements of NPM and reflected a managerialist logic in the pursuit of efficiency, the use of targets, incentives and performance measurement. However, a strong professional service logic was also found to drive active client behaviour in relation to the management of OHS. Understanding the institutional logics driving client OHS practices is an important theoretical development that can stimulate reflexive practice which may create an impetus for change.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | health and safety; infrastructure; institutional theory; public sector procurement; value for money |
| Index terms: | value-for-money, performance measurement, infrastructure project, interview, institutional logic, public sector procurement, health and safety, institutional theory, occupational health and safety, performance improvement, client organization, public infrastructure, efficiency, new public management, Australia, infrastructure construction, government agency, professional service |
| Subjects: | client relations, Geography, organization, data collection methods, evaluation, theoretical framing, occupational health and safety management, infrastructure and transport systems, sociology, administrative law, political science, civil engineering, contractual arrangements, health safety and environment, performance measurement, performance management |
| Topics: | Health and Safety, Governance, Legal Issues, Value Management, Procurement, Business Strategy, Geographical Context, Quality Management, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Organizational Design, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here