Organizing for digitalization through mutual constitution: The case of a design firm

Morgan, B (2019) Organizing for digitalization through mutual constitution: The case of a design firm. Construction Management and Economics, 37(7), pp. 400-417. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

As the pace of digital change accelerates, so the ability of firms in the construction industry to organize for digitalization is becoming increasingly important. While extant research identifies the diffusion of digital innovations in firms as a non-linear process influenced by embedded contextual elements stemming from several complex social systems, it does not address the relationship between these social systems. A longitudinal embedded case of the process followed by one incumbent firm as it adopts building information modelling (BIM) is presented. Data covers a 15-year period and charts the adoption process at multiple levels: user, firm and institution. The case supports existing research by showing that BIM adoption in the firm is successful through a combination of actions involving 1) investment and leadership support, 2) standards and policies and 3) training and skills development. Drawing on Gidden’s Structuration Theory, it contributes to this research by finding that the adoption of BIM is facilitated by a mutually constitutive relationship between user, firm and institution. Firms play a central role in enabling this relationship, by both attending to and enabling endogenous user-led change while seeking to influence exogenous institutional change.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: building information modelling; digital technology; institutional change; longitudinal studies; organizational change; technological adoption; technological change
Index terms: skills development, building information modelling, design firm, institutional change, drawing, construction industry, organizational change, becoming, social system, technological change, digital technology, digitalization
Subjects: innovation studies, computing systems, philosophical process, industry analysis, digital technology, technical documentation, practitioner, sociology, social theory, business, personnel development, information systems
Topics: Research Practice, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Human Resources, Roles and Professions, Organizational Design, Business Strategy
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here