Rafferty, M and Toner, P (2019) Thinking like capital markets: Financialisation of the Australian construction industry. Construction Management and Economics, 37(3), pp. 156-168. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
The concept of financialisation has not yet become a major subject in mainstream construction economics research. This is surprising since construction risk, risk management and project financing have long been important issues for researchers and practitioners. This paper introduces the concept of financialisation, outlines its causes in the construction industry and identifies some effects. An important dimension of financialisation in the construction industry can be seen in the growing conversion of illiquid built assets into liquid financial instruments that have become a distinct global asset class. These liquid construction assets have become important to current risk management and profit strategies of developers, major construction firms and capital market investors. Five key drivers of financialisation in the construction industry are identified. The article finds that a principal effect of financialisation in construction is to intensify competition for access to global capital, which in turn reinforces long-established tendencies for risk shifting in the contractual chain. The Australian construction industry has been an early adopter of the key drivers of financialisation and is used in this article as a case study. In developing the case study analysis the article also draws on observations by major Australian construction industry associations and financial institutions.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Australia; competition; financialisation; risk; risk-shifting |
| Index terms: | construction industry, investor, financing, case study, practitioner, construction firm, Australia, dimension, competition, profit, construction economics, built asset, conversion, markets, strategy, risk management |
| Subjects: | manufacturing engineering, health monitoring assessment and metrics, risk assessment, asset management, management, organization, data collection methods, market analysis, industry analysis, economic analysis, practitioner, Geography, sociology, financial analysis |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Roles and Professions, Cost Management, Geographical Context, Risk Management, Stakeholder Management, Engineering Principles, Health and Safety, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here