Incentive strategies for construction project manager: A common agency perspective

Sha, K (2019) Incentive strategies for construction project manager: A common agency perspective. Construction Management and Economics, 37(8), pp. 461-471. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

According to the principal-agent theory, the agent should be motivated to behave in a manner consistent with the principal’s requirements. By expanding the focus from the bilateral principal-agent relationship within the firm to the triangular relationship between the client, the construction company and its project manager, this study seeks to explore a new way in which construction firms determining incentive strategies for their construction project managers (CPMs). A common agency model of 'one servant of two masters' is established while some negative/positive factors are identified, including rent-seeking effect, collusion effect and check-and-balance effect between the three parties. An autonomy-incentive grid is developed in which one can distinguish four alternative strategies. Implementation costs of each strategy in different scenarios are qualitatively assessed and a set of incentive strategies suitable for different scenarios are determined according to the complicatedness of the project and the type of the client. The model of 'one servant of two masters' may provide conceptual insights into incentive strategies for CPMs, and provide practical guidelines for construction firms, but at the same time, it needs testing, verifying and improving in the future practice.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: client; common agency; incentive; principal-agent theory; project manager
Index terms: agency, construction company, construction firm, construction project, agent, manager, testing, strategy, collusion, implementation, project manager
Subjects: production management, management, contractual arrangements, organization, practitioner, profession, tendering, sociology, professional practice
Topics: Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Business Strategy, Procurement, Project Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here