Simu, K and Lidelöw, H (2019) Middle managers' perceptions of operations strategies at construction contractors. Construction Management and Economics, 37(6), pp. 351-366. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
Operations strategies focus on how a firm delivers value, while business strategies focus on what to deliver and where. Lean is an operations strategy prioritizing flow efficiency. In construction, empirical underpinning of operations strategies has been limited. The aim is to capture how perceptions of operations strategy in construction practice aligns with existing theories of operations strategy organized in decision categories. Nine in-depth interviews with contractor middle managers were transcribed and analyzed to capture their perceptions of operations strategies. Results show: (1) decision categories in construction differ from manufacturing, and (2) differences between resource and flow efficient operations strategies exist. A resource efficient strategy focuses cost and delivery as competitive criteria, while customer value is targeted in a flow efficient strategy. Proposed structural decision categories are standardization, organization and production planning, supply chain, and infrastructural decision categories are human resources, continuous improvement, long-term perspective, process vs. project, and performance measurements. Infrastructural categories are more difficult to replicate and render competitive advantage if successfully aligned with business strategy. An operations strategy strictly focused on project delivery, such as lean construction, is not automatically aligned with the business strategy, but can achieve satisfactory project performance.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | competitive advantage; construction management; decision categories; lean construction; project management |
| Index terms: | project performance, standardization, project delivery, project management, prioritizing, efficiency, competitive advantage, performance measurement, continuous improvement, human resource, construction contractor, manager, lean construction, interview, production planning, business strategy, strategy |
| Subjects: | performance management, performance measurement, management, project management theory and practice, decision analysis, building construction, market analysis, business, data collection methods, practitioner, project delivery |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Human Resources, Site Management, Research Practice, Project Management, Business Strategy, Procurement, Risk Management, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here