Ade, R and Rehm, M (2020) Reaching for the stars: Green construction cost premiums for homestar certification. Construction Management and Economics, 38(6), pp. 570-580. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
The assumption that undertaking certification, using a green building rating tool, will increase capital construction cost has been well studied in commercial buildings with mixed results, but less attention has been given to the much larger residential sector. This paper studies New Zealand’s Homestar residential green building rating tool and estimates the cost premium associated with 6-Homestar certification by analyzing the actual capital construction costs of 718 newly built homes in Auckland, New Zealand. To undertake this research, the authors contacted and collected actual capital construction costs from builders and developers of recently constructed single-family homes across Auckland. Given the sensitive nature of property-level construction cost data, this study marks the first development and application of hedonic cost modelling to analyses actual construction costs of single-family homes. The authors find a 12% cost premium for 6-Homestar certification, comprising an 11% hard cost premium and 1% in additional soft costs.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction cost; green buildings; sustainability |
| Index terms: | green building, certification, estimate, builder, modelling, construction cost, New Zealand, commercial building |
| Subjects: | financial and cost management, analytical methods, construction type, Geography, administrative processes, design practice, practitioner |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Engineering Principles, Roles and Professions, Construction Technology, Contract Administration, Geographical Context, Cost Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here