Aibinu, A A and Papadonikolaki, E (2020) Conceptualizing and operationalizing team task interdependences: BIM implementation assessment using effort distribution analytics. Construction Management and Economics, 38(5), pp. 420-446. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
Building Information Modelling (BIM) is a technological innovation currently at the forefront of digital transformation in the built environment. To achieve satisfactory outcomes with BIM, adopters need to find the most appropriate implementation strategy that is economically efficient. The research discussed here explores why and how distribution of effort spent on various tasks over project life cycle can be used as a metric for assessing and improving the performance of BIM implementation. Using quantitative data collected from a single in-depth case study of a BIM-enabled design and build project and subsequent interviews with three project actors and 11 BIM experts, to validate and triangulate the findings, we explore the use of effort data to analyze and visualize effort distribution patterns. The visualizations revealed the dynamics of team collaboration and task interdependences in BIM-enabled work and their impact on effort distribution. Lack of timely input by the contractor, subcontractors and suppliers influenced unusual patterns in the distribution of efforts indicating potential sources of inefficiency and unnecessary costs in the BIM process; thereby revealing the pivotal role of procurement structure and suggesting the need for timely involvement of key project participants. The contribution of this work is twofold. Methodologically, effort distribution analytics can provide insights that managers can use to improve BIM implementation process. Theoretically, the findings can be used to support informed decision-making, control cost, optimize resources, manage cash flow and to structure fees.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building information modelling; construction; effort distribution; performance assessment; team collaboration |
| Index terms: | case study, building information modelling, transformation, life cycle, built environment, technological innovation, dynamics, interdependence, performance assessment, implementation, team collaboration, manager, cash flow, interview, strategy, decision-making, design and build, subcontractor, visualization |
| Subjects: | assessment methods, decision analysis, organizational analysis, information systems, collaborative management, systems engineering, infrastructure and transport systems, design practice, management, financial management, innovation and technology management, contractual arrangements, business, data collection methods, practitioner, value management |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Procurement, Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Human Resources, Design Practice, Urban Studies, Digital Applications, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here