Losing face from engagement: an overlooked risk in the implementation of participatory organisational health and safety initiatives in the construction industry

Ajslev, J Z N; Wåhlin-Jacobsen, C D; Brandt, M; Møller, J L and Andersen, L L (2020) Losing face from engagement: an overlooked risk in the implementation of participatory organisational health and safety initiatives in the construction industry. Construction Management and Economics, 38(9), pp. 824-839. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

Participatory designs are regarded as a positive way to develop and execute organisational health and safety interventions in the construction industry. While most studies focus on effect measures, little is known about process-related factors shaping the outcomes of interventions. In this article, the authors suggest that success in implementing organisational interventions is tied to microsocial mechanisms that affect whether engagement and creativity materialise into improvements. In this regard, interaction within intervention activities has been overlooked as relevant data sources. To exemplify how these may be useful, video-recorded interactions between participants in an intervention workshop setting are analysed. The framework focuses on threats to the participants' face (i.e. their public self-image), the participants “facework”, and on how social action is oriented to deontic, epistemic and emotional domains of order. The analysis shows how threats to the participants' faces arise in interaction, diverting the focus of discussions away from the aim of the workshops; developing initiatives to improve employees' health and safety. The analysis highlights that participatory interventions may be ineffective if potential face threats are not mitigated and managed actively. We suggest that the manager-facilitator-employee communicational design should be an area of increased focus.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction industry; conversation analysis; occupational health and safety; organisational interventions
Index terms: participatory design, manager, health and safety, occupational health and safety, face, construction industry, implementation, interaction, creativity, workshop, facilitator
Subjects: construction type, practitioner, design methods, psychology, contractual arrangements, health safety and environment, occupational health and safety management, industry analysis, innovation and creative processes, behavioral psychology
Topics: Construction Technology, Procurement, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Organizational Design, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here