Understanding BIM's impact on professional work practices using activity theory

Akintola, A; Venkatachalam, S and Root, D (2020) Understanding BIM's impact on professional work practices using activity theory. Construction Management and Economics, 38(5), pp. 447-467. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

Recent critiques of the BIM literature describe it as largely devoid of critical theoretical perspectives and theorization capable of explaining the nature of change in work practices in a holistic manner. In response, the authors argue that, from a theoretical standpoint, implementing BIM within professional work practices (as activity systems) induces their evolution through dysfunctions created within the systems and their resolution. Cases of professional organizations in South Africa that have implemented BIM within their organization and in multi-organizational projects helped to develop new theoretical insights into how professional work practices evolve using activity theory-based re-description of the data. Changes in professional work practices were analyzed sequentially within the framework, confirming theoretical propositions and revealing the dynamics between and within the interconnected system of actors, their object, tools, rules guiding work, roles they assume and the stakeholders. Essentially, the findings imply that the implementation of BIM significantly changes work practices within organizations, but gradually and over time. This supports an evolutionary, rather than a radical or revolutionary, view of BIM-induced change. This theoretical perspective could explain future dimensions of change in professional work practices involving BIM, and indeed similar work mediating tools.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: activity theory; building information modelling; collective work; social context; technological change; work practices
Index terms: technological change, critique, dynamics, activity theory, building information modelling, South Africa, implementation, resolution, work practice, dimension, evolution, professional work
Subjects: evaluation and assessment methods, environmental science, information systems, professional development, health monitoring assessment and metrics, contractual arrangements, innovation studies, systems engineering, management, Geography, conflict resolution, theoretical framing
Topics: Engineering Principles, Sustainability, Information Management, Organizational Design, Research Practice, Digital Applications, Stakeholder Management, Procurement, Geographical Context, Business Strategy, Health and Safety
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here