Alves, T d C L; Neuman, Y; Walsh, K D; Needy, K L and AlMaian, R (2020) Highly effective companies in supplier quality surveillance practices: A quantitative analysis. Construction Management and Economics, 38(3), pp. 239-258. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
Results presented are part of a larger mixed-mode study on supplier quality practices focusing on the cross-analysis of interviews, focus groups, and a questionnaire, which collected actual data about timing, costs, practices, and non-conformances associated with purchase orders (POs) from Engineering Procure and Construct (EPC) projects for four material types considered relevant to projects built by EPC contractors based in the United States. The present discussion specifically focuses on the analysis of the non-parametric dataset obtained from the POs to investigate a subset of companies labelled as highly effective companies (HECs). This contribution is unique as it used a mixed-mode approach to collect data beyond construction sites and investigate the product/supplier side of construction processes to advance knowledge of how materials can be sent to construction project sites free of defects and rework and indicates practices that contribute to this goal. When compared to other companies in the dataset, HECs engage in more hours of observation in suppliers' facilities, communicate more often with suppliers, put more effort and time in the planning stages of the project, use more practices related to supplier quality surveillance and supplier quality management, and find non-conformances earlier in the project.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | early supplier involvement; engineering; engineering-procure-construct; nonparametric statistics; quality management; supplier; survey; United States |
| Index terms: | interview, United States, focus group, rework, construction site, survey, construction project, construction process, questionnaire, dataset, quantitative analysis, surveillance, statistics, quality management |
| Subjects: | work location, operations management, data analysis and analytics, data collection methods, mathematical modelling, data management, building construction, quality assurance, monitoring and control systems, production management, Geography |
| Topics: | Governance, Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Site Management, Quality Management, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here