Ammar, M A (2020) Resource optimisation in line of balance scheduling. Construction Management and Economics, 38(8), pp. 715-725. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
The Critical Path Method (CPM) has failed practically for scheduling repetitive projects and Line Of Balance (LOB) has emerged as an alternative for scheduling such projects. Because of the size of most repetitive projects, efficient resource management plays a vital role in their successful implementation. However, resource levelling and allocation have not been formally investigated in repetitive projects. Heuristic methods and optimization techniques have been traditionally used to solve resource scheduling problems like the latter. Although heuristic methods can handle large-size projects, they do not guarantee optimal solutions. In this paper, resource levelling and allocation problems under LOB scheme are modelled as an optimization problem that guarantees optimal solutions. Resource continuity and logical dependency between activities are maintained where constant activity progress rate is assumed. An example project is used to demonstrate the details of model formulation. A complete solution for the range of feasible project durations is obtained as a Time-Resource Trade-Off curve. A pipeline project is used to validate the developed model revealing that the developed model is superior. The proposed model provides contractors with a complete picture for resource usage along with the range of feasible project durations from which the optimal alternative can be selected.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | line of balance; nonlinear mathematical programming; optimization; repetitive projects; resource scheduling |
| Index terms: | duration, guarantee, resource management, resource levelling, optimization technique, resource optimization, scheduling, repetitive project, resource scheduling, pipeline construction, critical path method, mathematical programming, heuristic, implementation, line of balance |
| Subjects: | algorithms, project controls, risk assessment, contractual arrangements, control systems, civil engineering, operations research, contract structure, resource management, production management |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Digital Applications, Risk Management, Procurement, Site Management, Time Control, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here