Performance-based control of variability and tolerance in off-site manufacture and assembly: Optimization of penalty on poor production quality

Arashpour, M; Heidarpour, A; Akbar Nezhad, A; Hosseinifard, Z; Chileshe, N and Hosseini, R (2020) Performance-based control of variability and tolerance in off-site manufacture and assembly: Optimization of penalty on poor production quality. Construction Management and Economics, 38(6), pp. 502-514. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

Defects and quality problems in off-site manufacturing of building parts are caused by different variables. Subsequently, rework is required during on-site subassembly aggregation. Rework and tampering with prefabricated parts has implications including suboptimal structural/non-structural performance, delays and increased costs. Currently there is a gap in the off-site construction literature in developing effective interventions to reflect on variability in operations of subassembly manufacturers. On this basis, and in the first step of the current research, point clouds of the as-built status of parts are generated by laser scanners and compared with the as-designed status represented by Building Information models (BIM). Then, optimization modelling is used for development of a balanced penalty and incentive (PI) scheme to minimize variability. For this purpose, total expenditure on variability reduction is offset by revenues generated from penalties on poor quality. This optimization-based research contributes to the off-site construction literature by providing cost-effective solutions to quality problems. Furthermore, models and findings are of practical importance to off-site manufacturers by encouraging precision and discouraging discrepancy.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: advanced manufacturing; construction project management; decision support systems; gaming behaviour; hypothesis testing
Index terms: off-site construction, modelling, testing, variability, construction project management, point cloud, rework, revenue, manufacturer, off-site manufacturing, penalty, gaming, decision support, performance-based
Subjects: statistical analysis, regulatory law, decision analysis, building construction, digital design, project management theory and practice, decision-making and reasoning, performance measurement, manufacturing engineering, economic analysis, analytical methods, professional practice, operations management, practitioner
Topics: Digital Applications, Legal Issues, Quality Management, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Construction Technology
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here